Other than Halliburton, Zionists and Larry Silverstein, who profited from the 9/11 false flag operation?

The purpose of insurance is to cover against loss, not to enrich.





You really think Silverstein profited from the WTC being taken down? Where is the money coming from for cleanup and rebuilding?





You've got a lot to learn about commercial property.





EDIT - Mikey, that simply means payment was made for the value of the buildings. I don't know for certain about the WTC, but most commercial property has a mortgage attached to it. Guess who gets first crack at insurance proceeds? The mortgage holders. Any funds Silverstein receives are net of the debt obligations on the building. And what is he left with? A pile of rubble. So if he rebuilds, what is the enrichment?





Just like, if your house burns down, and you have a mortgage, your mortgage company gets the proceeds, and nets you a check for the insurance procees minus what you owed.





Do the math.Other than Halliburton, Zionists and Larry Silverstein, who profited from the 9/11 false flag operation?
no one did! Because 10 trillion in debt means they are being paid in imaginary money.Other than Halliburton, Zionists and Larry Silverstein, who profited from the 9/11 false flag operation?
Marvin, Jeb, George,Neils, and dad. Carlyle Group. I am a Zionist and I don't see that connection. Why do you have to mix your antisemetic BS in with the Truth of 911. The WTC was destroyed with a controled demolition. But I am sorry Mel Gibson it wasn't the fault of Israel.
Check the owners of Haliburton...you will be suprised.....MORE DEMOCRATS OWN SHARES..in fact one FAMOUS DEM FAMILY OWNS 51%





THE LBJ crew....and now Soro is getting in the Picture for 196 million....but that is ok with the dems...RIGHT%26gt;%26gt;%26gt;
pretty good response there dr.who.. none of the above had to do with 9/11/01.. it was der Slick meister-- WmJeffersonClinton, tom daschell, osamma, and a few covert cia agents(valorie plame and her assholeborn husband) working with the airline pres's and the owners of the towers(which were about to be declaired blighted and it would have cost bllions to tear those rotting things down).. follow the money-- it is the truth.
There are only two people that I can think of who profited from that and that is Rudy G. baby, and the lease-holder of the towers. The lease-holder paid $15 million and with his new insurance, which BTW he added 'acts of terrorism' to it, the guy came out with $900 million. Halliburton and Zionists had nothing to do with it. When building 7 was 'pulled' it contained ALL security and Intel from the CIA.
I'll tell you only if you can tell me what Haliburton does. Tell me about their business and what makes them money.





You still haven't told me what they do. Tell me how war makes them money. Cmon smart guy tell me.
Um........... I think it goes higher and deeper than them.





The Global Cabal with their need for total control profitted more than anybody. With the fear that was produced by the horrific events of that day, the patriot act was welcomed with open arms, but little do people know that this act was just one step closer to a One-World Government. It is so scary how so right George Orwell was.

Kelbro Corporation

All firms maximize profits? true or false?

False. Some firms exists simply for tax purposes, creating postive cash flow but a net loss to create a tax deduction. Others exist solely as a legal entity for the benefit of another (parent company).All firms maximize profits? true or false?
False... some maximize profit only to the extend they obtain benfit after taxes... some firms are kept at a loss in order to mitigate profit in other areas....All firms maximize profits? true or false?
yes, unless they're a non-profit organization.
False, often firms pursue policies that don't maximize profits but that have other benefits. An example might be philanthropy. The money donated doesn't generate a return but satisfies other needs such as making employees feel they work for an honorable organization.





Maybe a better example is when an individual is approached on the street by a panhandler. The profit maximizing course would be to not give a hand out. But people do. Why? Because the ';value'; derived from making the donation outweighs the cost. People at work sometimes behave in the same way.





Also, some firms will forgo profit opportunities if there is sufficient risk.

Health insurance industry profits have quadrupled in the last seven years...True or false?

True?Health insurance industry profits have quadrupled in the last seven years...True or false?
False





They have quintupled


http://74.125.47.132/search?q=cache:qda6鈥?/a>





And they actually have people who's job it is to find ways to deny coverage so they can increase profits. What a bunch of scumbags.








The U.S. averages twice as much spending on health care, with worse outcomes, than any other industrialized nation. Our country is unique in its dependence on over 1200 for-profit health insurances that function as gatekeepers to health care. Shareholder and CEO profits trump access to quality health care.Health insurance industry profits have quadrupled in the last seven years...True or false?
Probably false. But I don't know. I would say their profits have gone down due to large payouts on frivolous lawsuits. If people want to complain about the cost, then they should look in the correct place for that cost. Tort reform would be a fresh start to controlling the costs. But given that most of Congress and almost every lobbyist is a lawyer, do you see that happening anytime soon? I don't.
False. Health Insurance companies average about 3% profit. So if they were making 25% of that 7 years ago, do you really believe they were making 0.75% profit then?





How much does a law firm make when they win a lawsuit against a doctor or hospital or drug manufacturer? 50%?. 66%?
Take a look at the stock charts of the major insurers and what do you see? Not a pretty picture.





Next straw man, please. We've heard plenty about the insurance companies that can mint money at will and not be subject to market forces.
Yeah heaven forbid somebody should actually make money in this economy... damn big business, making all that profit, employing all those people, developing all that research... who the hell do they think they are?
ya most people steal their healthcare now by abusing their system so the people who pay for insurnce have to pay more, you have it wrong their revenue has increased not their profits
True.


Yay!! lol


Oh yeah @ that guy: Making money off the backs of heartbreak %26amp; sick/ dying people, nice.


Maybe i shuld set up a business where I render people like YOU unable to work
Why don't you provide a link so we can all see how profits have increased over the years?
true. and they turn down needed care for very sick people because it's not ';approved.';
True, while coverage has gone down.
5x
False
Must be the global warming thats causing all of that ...
True, that is why they are in it, for the money

True or False? Only at the output where average revenue equals average total cost will profits be maximized?

False - profits will be zero at this point.True or False? Only at the output where average revenue equals average total cost will profits be maximized?
False- at this point you are not making any money you are at the break even point. You make money where revenue exceeds costs.

True or False ..If Total Profits are maximized, the marginal profits is zero.?

True or False ..If Total Profits are maximized, the marginal profits is zero.





Explain pleaseTrue or False ..If Total Profits are maximized, the marginal profits is zero.?
It depends on the market you are describing.





For a perfectly competitive market: price=marginal revenue=marginal cost.





Economic profits in this market are zero in the long run. In the short run, a firm may see small economic profits but since there are no barriers to enter the market, another company will enter itself into the market, supply increases will drive economic profit back to zero.





In this scenario, profits are maximized. So, True.





If you are talking about a monopolistic market though, the answer would be false.True or False ..If Total Profits are maximized, the marginal profits is zero.?
True





Regardless of market structure, profits are maximized at mc=mr. Since marginal costs equal marginal revenue, the marginal profits are zero. At any other level, profits are not maximized; they can be increased by changing the output level.





This happens to equal the market price only in pure competition, but mc=mr maximizes profits in any market structure.
False, anyhow if total profit is increased then marginal profit will have any percentage.

Is this true or false? 1.To mximize profits, a firm should expand production as long as it is making profits.?

False- you will reach a point where profitability the amount of money made per dollar input will decline. (could be a supply, production, or input issue) examples (saturated market, lack of space for production and storage, overtime) respectively . You will reach a point where you have expanded production but would have made more money if you had stopped at a previous point. So that while you may continue to expand under your question may make sense in some situations


(your competition suffers a major production setback and you want to steal market share now in the hope of keeping some of it where you no longer have that advantage, in most cases the real world answer will lie somewhere along the decline of the profitability curve past its' peak.


Profitability is a hard concept sometimes. One of the best examples is big oil companies. Many people point to their record profits, but the truth is that these companies are so big to make that amount of money. If I had to depend on income from a company I would start I could go into a lot of things pharmacuticals, tobacco, computer chips , software or any number of things and make more money back for every dollar I put in than an oil company. example take a look at how much money Microsoft would make if it were the same size as Exxon (Exxon is about 2.5 times bigger) can you imagine Bill Gates sitting any higher up the richest person on the planet list? But I digress. Hope this helps.

True of false: if economic profits are zero, then economic rents must also be zero.?

true of false: if economic profits are zero, then economic rents must also be zero.True of false: if economic profits are zero, then economic rents must also be zero.?
false. They are not related at all.

Kelbro Corporation