Sunday, February 7, 2010

Other than Halliburton, Zionists and Larry Silverstein, who profited from the 9/11 false flag operation?

The purpose of insurance is to cover against loss, not to enrich.





You really think Silverstein profited from the WTC being taken down? Where is the money coming from for cleanup and rebuilding?





You've got a lot to learn about commercial property.





EDIT - Mikey, that simply means payment was made for the value of the buildings. I don't know for certain about the WTC, but most commercial property has a mortgage attached to it. Guess who gets first crack at insurance proceeds? The mortgage holders. Any funds Silverstein receives are net of the debt obligations on the building. And what is he left with? A pile of rubble. So if he rebuilds, what is the enrichment?





Just like, if your house burns down, and you have a mortgage, your mortgage company gets the proceeds, and nets you a check for the insurance procees minus what you owed.





Do the math.Other than Halliburton, Zionists and Larry Silverstein, who profited from the 9/11 false flag operation?
no one did! Because 10 trillion in debt means they are being paid in imaginary money.Other than Halliburton, Zionists and Larry Silverstein, who profited from the 9/11 false flag operation?
Marvin, Jeb, George,Neils, and dad. Carlyle Group. I am a Zionist and I don't see that connection. Why do you have to mix your antisemetic BS in with the Truth of 911. The WTC was destroyed with a controled demolition. But I am sorry Mel Gibson it wasn't the fault of Israel.
Check the owners of Haliburton...you will be suprised.....MORE DEMOCRATS OWN SHARES..in fact one FAMOUS DEM FAMILY OWNS 51%





THE LBJ crew....and now Soro is getting in the Picture for 196 million....but that is ok with the dems...RIGHT%26gt;%26gt;%26gt;
pretty good response there dr.who.. none of the above had to do with 9/11/01.. it was der Slick meister-- WmJeffersonClinton, tom daschell, osamma, and a few covert cia agents(valorie plame and her assholeborn husband) working with the airline pres's and the owners of the towers(which were about to be declaired blighted and it would have cost bllions to tear those rotting things down).. follow the money-- it is the truth.
There are only two people that I can think of who profited from that and that is Rudy G. baby, and the lease-holder of the towers. The lease-holder paid $15 million and with his new insurance, which BTW he added 'acts of terrorism' to it, the guy came out with $900 million. Halliburton and Zionists had nothing to do with it. When building 7 was 'pulled' it contained ALL security and Intel from the CIA.
I'll tell you only if you can tell me what Haliburton does. Tell me about their business and what makes them money.





You still haven't told me what they do. Tell me how war makes them money. Cmon smart guy tell me.
Um........... I think it goes higher and deeper than them.





The Global Cabal with their need for total control profitted more than anybody. With the fear that was produced by the horrific events of that day, the patriot act was welcomed with open arms, but little do people know that this act was just one step closer to a One-World Government. It is so scary how so right George Orwell was.
  • Kelbro Corporation
  • 2 comments:

    1. In the end, Larry Sliverstein received double the payout on the insurance claim, taxpayers unknowingly paid New York for clean-up, Halliburton received numerous contracts in Iraq, Ironically the records and data for the 3 Trillion Dollars unaccounted for by the pentagon were "lost" when building 7 came down. Clearing Rumsfeld and Cheney from further scrutiny. Hindsight truly is 20/20

      ReplyDelete
    2. During the 1990s, New York was suffering from the effects of the 1987 stock market crash, which led to high vacancy rates at the World Trade Center. A sale of the property was considered too complex, so it was decided by the Port Authority to open a 99-year lease to competitive bidding.

      In January 2001, Silverstein, via Silverstein Properties, made a $3.2 billion bid to lease-purchase the World Trade Center.[17] Silverstein was outbid by $30 million by Vornado Realty. However, Vornado withdrew in March, giving Silverstein 14 days to negotiate a new bid. Silverstein's negotiated bid was finalized on April 26, 2001, in partnership with Westfield America, Inc.and accepted on July 24, 2001.This was the first time in the complex's 31-year history that it had changed management.

      The lease agreement applied to One, Two, Four, and Five World Trade Center, and about 425,000 square feet of retail space. Silverstein put up $14 million of his own money to secure the deal. The agreement gave Silverstein, as leaseholder, the right and the obligation to rebuild the structures if destroyed.

      All of the buildings at the World Trade Center, including buildings 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7, were destroyed or damaged beyond repair on September 11, 2001. After a protracted dispute with insurers over the amount of coverage available for rebuilding World Trade Center buildings 1, 2, 4 and 5, a series of court decisions determined that a maximum of $4.55 billion was payable and settlements were reached with the insurers in 2007.

      After the September 11 attacks, the United States Congress approved $8 billion in tax-exempt Liberty Bonds to fund development in the private sector at lower-than-market interest rates. $3.4 billion remained unallocated in March 2006 designated for Lower Manhattan.

      In April 2006, after several months of negotiation aimed toward permitting reconstruction to commence, Silverstein yielded some of his rights back to the Port Authority, in order to facilitate rebuilding at the site. Those negotiations resulted in Silverstein ceding his rights to building One (and its pro-rata share of the above-noted Liberty Bond funds) to the Port Authority, and allocating a portion of the insurance proceeds to the rebuilding of building One in favor of the Port Authority. In return, the remaining pro-rata shares of the Liberty Bond funds were allocated to Silverstein Properties for purposes of rebuilding the remaining buildings, and government agencies are expected to be among the tenants in those buildings.

      ReplyDelete